Add support for Generic class definitions

Added support in parser to translate characters surrounded by `~` into generic type definition ie: `Class01~T~` would turn into `Class01<T>`
This commit is contained in:
Justin Greywolf
2019-12-05 12:55:46 -08:00
parent 91d986970b
commit 2a41280076
6 changed files with 161 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -56,6 +56,33 @@ describe('class diagram, ', function () {
parser.parse(str);
});
it('should handle generic class', function() {
const str =
'classDiagram\n' +
'class Car~T~\n' +
'Driver -- Car : drives >\n' +
'Car *-- Wheel : have 4 >\n' +
'Car -- Person : < owns';
parser.parse(str);
});
it('should handle generic class with brackets', function() {
const str =
'classDiagram\n' +
'class Dummy_Class~T~ {\n' +
'String data\n' +
' void methods()\n' +
'}\n' +
'\n' +
'class Flight {\n' +
' flightNumber : Integer\n' +
' departureTime : Date\n' +
'}';
parser.parse(str);
});
it('should handle class definitions', function() {
const str =
'classDiagram\n' +
@@ -326,6 +353,21 @@ describe('class diagram, ', function () {
expect(relations[3].relation.lineType).toBe(classDb.lineType.DOTTED_LINE);
});
it('should handle generic class with relation definitions', function () {
const str = 'classDiagram\n' + 'Class01~T~ <|-- Class02';
parser.parse(str);
const relations = parser.yy.getRelations();
expect(parser.yy.getClass('Class01').id).toBe('Class01');
expect(parser.yy.getClass('Class01').genericType).toBe('T');
expect(parser.yy.getClass('Class02').id).toBe('Class02');
expect(relations[0].relation.type1).toBe(classDb.relationType.EXTENSION);
expect(relations[0].relation.type2).toBe('none');
expect(relations[0].relation.lineType).toBe(classDb.lineType.LINE);
});
it('should handle class annotations', function () {
const str = 'classDiagram\n' + 'class Class1\n' + '<<interface>> Class1';
parser.parse(str);